Send Us Feedback

Please send us your feedback, suggestions, and bug reports. Thank you!

Bill HB 2264 (Biennium: 2009-2010)        

Regulating the sale of firearms at gun shows and events.

View_full_bill

Mar 15 - By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

None

None

Introduced by Rep. Brendan Williams, (D-Olympia) (D) on February 19, 2009, Requires that any person attempting to transfer ownership of arms from one person or business to any person must be licensed to do so in accordance with federal regulations, which requires a background check of the person seeking ownership and approval of the local law enforcement agency. Covers procedures that licensed dealers must follow in reporting of background checks and acceptable fee compensation for the Washington State Patrol to complete the background checks, among other provisions that must be followed by licensed dealers at gun shows.

Bill summary provided by: WashingtonVotes.org



Login or sign up to track the status of this bill.

Bill Comments

Click here to post a comment on Twitter

Please log in or sign up to post.

The first comment for HB 2264, Posted by me has an error. Under Article VI of the US Constitution, I wrote, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. Everyone (except apparently me) knows this is part of the second amendment of the U.S. Constitution. My question, “What Part of Infringed do you not understand?” still stands, for the second amendment.

Article VI of the US Constitution reads in part, “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States”.

My statement, I’M SORRY, I DO HAVE TO APPOLOGIZE, because, I just read AGLO 1975 No. 23, dated March 06, 1975, from Slade Gorton Attorney General (for Wa. State) and Philip H. Austin, Deputy Attorney General (for Wa. State). to Honorable R. Ted Bottiger State Senator, 2nd District (for Wa. State) and Honorable Peter von Reichbauer State Senator, 30th District (for Wa. State), which reads,in part, “Although not specifically required by any statute or constitutional provision, you have advised us that it has long been the (practice of all legislators), upon assuming office, to take the same oath of office as is prescribed by RCW 43.01.020 for officers of the executive branch of state government.”

Maybe your time would be better spent, by making the oath of office, as is prescribed by RCW 43.01.020 for officers of the executive branch of state government, required of all legislators, instead of trying to infringe on the State of Washington and United States Citizen’s rights, afforded by both the Constitution of the State of Washington and the Constitution of the United States of America??

In this case, “Practice” does not make Perfect!

STILL STANDS!!

 

RCW 43.01.020
Oath of office, reads,
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and
the Constitution and laws of the state of Washington, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties
of the office of (name of office) to the best of my ability.”

Article VI of the US Constitution.
Reads,
“the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."  

WHAT PART OF “INFRINGED”, DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?

I’M SORRY, I DO HAVE TO APPOLOGIZE, because, I just read AGLO 1975 No. 23, dated March 06, 1975, from Slade Gorton Attorney General (for Wa. State) and Philip H. Austin, Deputy Attorney General (for Wa. State). to Honorable R. Ted Bottiger State Senator, 2nd District (for Wa. State) and Honorable Peter von Reichbauer State Senator, 30th District (for Wa. State), which reads,in part, “Although not specifically required by any statute or constitutional provision, you have advised us that it has long been the (practice of all legislators), upon assuming office, to take the same oath of office as is prescribed by RCW 43.01.020 for officers of the executive branch of state government.”

Maybe your time would be better spent, by making the oath of office, as is prescribed by RCW 43.01.020 for officers of the executive branch of state government, required of all legislators, instead of trying to infringe on the State of Washington and United States Citizen’s rights, afforded by both the Constitution of the State of Washington and the Constitution of the United States of America??

In this case, “Practice” does not make Perfect!

 

Membership and a criminal background check are required for firearms sales at the Washington Arms Collectors gun shows. This bill does nothing other than infringe upon our second amendment rights. You don’t need an FFL transfer to sell privately to your friends or relatives. Why should we have to go through an FFL to sell to members in good standing of a private club. Bad bill and a waste of time. The Dept of Justice did a study and found that firearms purchased at gun shows were involved in a minuscule amount of crimes.

 

This bill never made it out of committee. It will likely appear next year, but with no cosponsors, the fiscal health of the state – there are bigger fish to fry for this legislature.

 
Any FFL dealer selling at a WAC show must already have the ATF form and NICS background completed prior to a sale. In addition they must only sell to a WAC member. Only private sales are completed without the ATF form and NICS check. But again can only be sold to a WAC member that has already had a check done for WAC membership. WAC rules of the road and existing laws already have this covered. This bill will do nothing but further erode the rights of the people under the disguise of public safety. A couple of months ago Americas 1st Freedom magazine had an extensive article detailing the fallacy of the so called gun show loop hole. Bottom line, this is one of many arrows the far left will be hurling our way over the next few years.
 

This bill is unconstitutional. Washington Arms Collectors already monitors firearm transfers. In order to buy or sell at shows you must be a member. To become a member you have to pass a background check.

 
Thumbs_up Thumbs_down 2

This bill infringes on our right to privacy and our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If legislation like this passes, it won’t be long before the government is sending people to our homes to confiscate our weapons. It is not the business of the government about whether or not I own a gun and / or how many I might have. Background checks are already done at the gun shows, so this law serves no purpose, other than infringing our ability to purchase and sell freely, and requiring registration of our firearms.

I would recommend that more work go into catching actual criminals and that the legislators leave the law-abiding citizen alone.

 
Thumbs_up Thumbs_down 1

No private sales at gun show or event, all sales must go through a licensed dealer. Gross misdemeanor if you violate this.

 

keeping a close eye on my second amendment rights!

 

The text of the bill isn’t posted yet, but I already don’t like it. Better watch this one!

 

Users Tracking this Bill

TrueLobby © 2010